Editorial : The Issues Related to Hemodialysis Catheter Lock Prophylaxis with Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Anil K. Saxena* , 1, Kenneth Abreo2, Tushar Vachharajani3
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2011
First Page: 9
Last Page: 11
Publisher ID: TOUNJ-4-9
Article History:Received Date: 7/4/2011
Revision Received Date: 25/5/2011
Acceptance Date: 26/5/2011
Electronic publication date: 5/7/2011
Collection year: 2011
open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the most preferred and promoted form of dialysis access due to their lowest complication rates. However, the changing demographic profile of end- stage renal disease (ESRD) with an increasing elderly and diabetic population having relatively poor vasculature, relative lack of prudent pre-ESRD planning for AV fistula creation, late referrals, and comparatively lower fistula maturation rates, are essentially the factors accountable for our continued dependence upon central venous catheters (CVCs) [1-3]. Moreover, CVCs remain the only means to provide instant access to the circulation during emergency situations arising from the unpredictable course of chronic kidney disease.
Virchow's described three broad categories of factors that contribute to thrombus formation -hypercoagulability, stasis and vascular endothelial injury. The placement of this relatively large foreign body traumatizes the host vessel and significantly alters hemodynamics fulfilling Virchow’s triad for thrombus formation and provides a nidus for bacterial entry into the circulation. However, catheter malfunction limits the life span of CVCs. Inadequate blood flow and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are common causes of recurrent use of thrombolytic therapy, antibiotics and often result in catheter removal. Generally, standard heparin (5000 U/ mL) is used to lock the CVCs to maintain catheter patency during the interdialytic period. Locking with heparin however, does not prevent bacterial colonization and subsequent development of CRBSI. Moreover, in vitro studies have shown that heparin may induce biofilm formation .
Replacing heparin with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) once a week, as a dialysis catheter locking solution significantly reduced the incidence of catheter malfunction and CRBSI in a well conducted multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial from Canada by Hemmelgarn and colleagues . The authors were able to decrease the rates of catheter malfunction by 50% and CRBSI by two-thirds, with the use of rt-PA once a week at a dose 1 mg per lumen. Patients (n=115) were randomly assigned to a catheter-locking group with heparin (5,000 U/mL) three times a week or with rt-PA (1 mg per lumen) substituted for heparin once a week and heparin used the remaining two times (n=110). Mean follow-up period after randomization was six months with treatment assignments concealed from patients, investigators, and trial staff. The primary outcome was catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was CRBSI.
In the rt-PA group, 20% (22/115) patients reached the primary outcome, compared with 34.8% (40/110) in the heparin group. CRBSI occurred in 5 (4.5%) patients in the rt-PA group and 15 (13.0%) patients in the heparin group. The risk for adverse events was similar (70% and 68.7%) in the rt-PA and heparin groups, respectively with no statistically significant difference in the serious adverse events between the two groups (20.9 % and 29.6%). Also, patients in the rt-PA group did not have a higher frequency and severity of bleeding episodes .
This landmark study has received a lot of attention from experts in the field, as the results are very encouraging from the viewpoint of the prevention of CRBSI. The results are comparable to the outcomes reported in earlier trials involving antimicrobial locking solutions for the prevention of CRBSI among hemodialysis (HD) patients [6-2] (Fig. 1). However, the following issues merit further considerations.
Randomized controlled trials showing 60 to100 percent reductions in hemodialysis catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI).
The first issue is the definition of catheter malfunction. Hemodialysis catheters considered dysfunctional as per K/DOQI guidelines if the delivered blood flow is less than 300ml/min. Currently available catheters are designed to provide blood flow of 400ml/min. The catheters are used as a bridging access until the permanent access is mature enough and the maturation time is often unpredictable. Besides the blood flow, the solute clearance needs to be included in the definition of catheter malfunction although reduced solute clearance could be the consequence of reduced blood flow. In the short-term, the formation of clots in and around the catheter, as well as fibrin sheath formation, leads to catheter dysfunction-a common complication of the HD catheter that further leads to the inability to deliver adequate dialysis.
Catheter malfunction is a broader term and has been defined differently by different authors. Definitions include - a blood flow ranging from 200 mL/ minute or less for a single session of dialysis, 250 mL/minute during two successive dialysis treatments, to less than 300 mL/ minute for any dialysis session and alternatively, inability to initiate dialysis [13, 14]. In the latter situation catheter replacement remains the sole option whereas in the former thrombolytic therapy may temporarily improve blood flow. Thus catheter removal appears to be a clinically more definitive marker of catheter malfunction than the peak blood flow. It appears that the optimal primary outcome obviously would have been the removal of the catheter, but the authors probably were concerned that they would not be able to enroll patients if they waited until catheters were removed due to malfunction. However, the hemodialysis guidelines actually define catheter malfunction on the basis of peak blood flow rather than the need for catheter replacement. Thus, the issue remains a matter of future debate.
Second, Hemmelgarn et al. have inadvertently raised an interesting issue concerning the possible mechanism whereby rt-PA lock prophylaxis could cause significant reductions in CRBSIs (1.37 vs 0.40 per 1000 catheter - days, P = 0.02) . A plausible explanation probably lies in the fact that catheter malfunction is frequently related to fibrin sheath or luminal clot formation. Fibrin, fibrinogen and fibronectin present in the thrombus enhance adherence of invading planktonic ‘slime’ producing bacteria, on the luminal surface of CVCs. This facilitates bacterial colonization and biofilm formation. Biofilms provide a protected environment for microorganisms for their multiplication and growth with their eventual discharge into the bloodstream causing CRBSI [3, 15, 16] (Fig. 2).
Raad et al. demonstrated a close relationship between thrombotic and infectious complications of CVCs with CRBSI rates significantly higher among patients with CVC - thrombosis than in those without clot in a 16 month follow up study (22.5 % vs 0.0%, P < 0.01) . A monthly rt-PA instillation reduced CRBSI episodes in patients with hemophilia; supporting the concept that thrombolysis could prevent CRBSI . Moreover, another study demonstrated inhibition of staphylococcal bacterial growth by Urokinase-type plasminogen activator which acted as an endogenous antibiotic .
The third issue is regarding the safety of rt-PA lock prophylaxis in the light of current evidence of the exit of catheter lock solutions into the circulation. Sungur et al, in their in-vitro studies performed on double lumen dialysis catheters, demonstrated a substantial amount of leak even when the corresponding catheter 'lock' volumes were used. Some catheters had lower leak ratios than the others, depending upon the size, filling volume and design . The leak ratio increased significantly with 20% overfill and leakage persisted even when 'lock' volume of 20% less than the manufacturer stated catheter volume, was used. Currently, the amount of leak has been found to be clinically important in explaining the bleeding episodes reported after heparin lock placement . Likewise, 0.2 ml overfill of the stated catheter volume of gentamicin lock solution, led to plasma ‘drug’ concentrations close to toxic levels in an Australian study .
In the study of Hemmelgarn et al, the risk for adverse events was similar between the two groups; 70% of patients in the rt-PA group and 68.7% of patients in the heparin group had an adverse event, while reported serious adverse events were 20.9 % and 29.6% in rt-PA and heparin group, respectively . Likewise, patients in the rt-PA group did not have a higher frequency of bleeding episodes. However, regardless of the reported fact that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups nearly one fifth of the patients in rt-PA group and almost one third in the heparin group, developed serious adverse events in the study with a short follow-up period of 6 months. This area warrants further long-term studies to investigate the impact of locking hemodialysis catheters with rt-PA in the light of recent reports on the exit of locking solutions in significant proportions, into the circulation – immediately after instillation and during the interdialytic period.
However, the lower likelihood of emergence of bacterial resistance could be one of the potential advantages of using rt-PA catheter lock prophylaxis. The trial sets a milestone and provides the first round findings on the new role of rt-PA in the prevention of hemodialysis catheter malfunction while setting the stage for more prospective randomized trials in this field to ascertain the efficacy and address the safety issues related to rt-PA.