RESEARCH ARTICLE


Central Venous Catheters in Dialysis: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly



Nabil J. Haddad, Sheri Van Cleef , Anil K. Agarwal*
Internal Medicine, Interventional Nephrology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
6
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 7073
Abstract HTML Views: 1364
PDF Downloads: 1728
ePub Downloads: 239
Total Views/Downloads: 10404
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3705
Abstract HTML Views: 769
PDF Downloads: 1301
ePub Downloads: 170
Total Views/Downloads: 5945



Creative Commons License
Anil K. Agarwal (Eds.) All rights reserved-© 2014 Bentham Science Publishers

* Address correspondence to this author at the Internal Medicine, Interventional Nephrology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Tel: 614 293 4997; Fax: 614 293 3073; E-mail: aagarwal@pol.net


Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVC) continue to remain a common modality of vascular access in end stage kidney disease patients maintained on hemodialysis. The increased morbidity and mortality associated with CVC, when compared to arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, is a serious health problem and a big challenge to the nephrology community. In this article we present the pros and cons of CVC, in addition to the different complications and excessive economical costs related to their use.

Keywords: Central venous catheters, hemodialysis, fibrin sheath, catheter infection, CVC complications, vascular access, tunneled catheters, CVC advantages.